Vodafone Idea shares slide 2% after Supreme Court defers AGR plea hearing

Synopsis

Vodafone Idea shares saw a dip on Monday after the Supreme Court deferred its AGR plea hearing to October 27. The delay prolongs uncertainty over the telecom giant’s Rs 5,606 crore liability, even as the government hints at a possible one-time settlement to ease financial strain.

Vodafone Idea Ltd (VIL) shares fell 2% on Monday after the Supreme Court postponed hearing the telecom giant’s plea against the government’s additional adjusted gross revenue (AGR) demand to October 27, extending uncertainty over the company’s longstanding financial liability.

VIL had filed a fresh petition challenging the Department of Telecommunications’ (DoT) demand of Rs 5,606 crore for the financial year 2016–17, seeking a direction for the DoT to "comprehensively re-assess and reconcile" all AGR dues for the period up to FY 2016–17, in line with the Deduction Verification Guidelines dated February 3, 2020.

The Supreme Court’s deferral follows earlier setbacks for Vodafone Idea and other telecom majors. Earlier this year, the apex court had rejected petitions from VIL and Bharti Airtel seeking rectification of alleged errors in the 2021 order calculating AGR dues.

Government signals possible settlement

Officials are reportedly drafting the framework while evaluating measures to prevent legal challenges from other telecom operators with AGR obligations, according to the Bloomberg report. The total dispute amounts to nearly Rs 2 lakh crore.

Also read | TCS, Tata Motors tumble up to 42% from peak, with over Rs 4 lakh crore wiped off Tata stocks in 2025 amid boardroom turmoil

The delayed hearing adds to the uncertainty surrounding Vodafone Idea’s balance sheet and investor sentiment. As the Supreme Court sets the next date for October 27, investors will be watching closely for any signs of a concrete resolution that could reshape Vodafone Idea’s financial outlook.

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)

...moreless

...moreless