Warner Bros. Sale Winner: Paramount... And Netflix?

After WBD’s board formally determined Paramount Skydance’s revised bid was superior this Thursday, Netflix publicly announced it would not raise to counter, leaving the deal in Paramount's hands.

Getty Images

Winners and Losers after Paramount’s revised offer was deemed “superior” and Netflix dropped its bid for Warner Bros. Discovery as a result.

Paramount Skydance’s latest move in the high-stakes auction for Warner Bros. Discovery has upended what had been a months-long bidding war between two of entertainment’s biggest players, leaving Netflix out of the race and Paramount standing poised to reshape the media landscape.

On Thursday, Paramount Skydance (Paramount) increased its offer for Warner Bros. Discovery (Warner) to $31 per share—up from a prior $30 bid—valuing the storied studio and media giant at roughly $110 billion including debt. The revised proposal also included financial incentives such as paying Warner’s breakup fee owed to Netflix and a quarterly “ticking fee” if the transaction doesn’t close quickly, sweetening the terms for shareholders.

Shortly after the Paramount offer, Warner’s board of directors determined that Paramount’s bid “constitutes a company superior proposal” compared to the existing Netflix merger agreement, triggering a contractual four-day window for Netflix to submit a revised offer. The board’s notice—a rare public step in merger negotiations—signaled confidence that Paramount’s terms delivered greater value and certainty for Warner’s shareholders.

Netflix, however, declined to raise its offer, saying that matching Paramount’s $31-per-share price would make the transaction “no longer financially attractive,” according to a joint statement from co-CEOs Ted Sarandos and Greg Peters. The streaming giant had previously agreed to a roughly $27.75 per share deal to acquire Warner’s studio and streaming assets.

The decision sent ripples through financial markets: Netflix’s stock jumped sharply as investors applauded the company’s decision to walk away from a costly bidding war, while Paramount’s shares rallied on expectations that it will emerge as the winning bidder.

Netflix’s withdrawal reflects a blend of strategic discipline and regulatory caution. A combined Netflix-Warner entity would have faced intense antitrust scrutiny given Netflix’s dominant global subscriber base, and Netflix management was unwilling to overpay in a high-risk deal.

Paramount’s ascendancy, meanwhile, brings its own challenges: the company must now navigate regulatory reviews, shareholder votes, and financing a massive acquisition. If completed, the deal would unite iconic franchises like Harry Potter and Top Gun, extend control over broadcasting networks like CNN and CBS, and mark one of the largest transformations in Hollywood’s history.

So, who were the winners and losers as a result of this stunning outcome?

Paramount Skydance: Winner

By prevailing in the competitive bidding process, Paramount has positioned itself to emerge as a top-tier global entertainment conglomerate. If closed, the acquisition would significantly expand Paramount’s content library, adding Warner’s deep vault of film and television franchises to Paramount’s existing assets. That sort of scale matters in a streaming-driven marketplace increasingly defined by subscriber retention, global distribution leverage, and franchise durability.

Strategically, the deal strengthens Paramount’s direct-to-consumer ambitions. Warner’s premium brands—including HBO and DC—complement Paramount’s broadcast strength and franchise filmmaking operation, creating a more balanced portfolio across theatrical, streaming, and linear platforms.

For Paramount, the Warner deal is, candidly, a have-to-have (in contrast to the Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos’ description of Warner Bros. Discovery as a “nice-to-have”). Paramount’s long-term prospects as a standalone media company were questionable at best. The Warner’s acquisition will give Paramount the scale to at least compete with Netflix and Disney in a media industry increasingly defined by scale.

Netflix: Winner

Even in defeat, Netflix may have emerged as a surprising winner in the sale saga surrounding Warner Bros. Discovery.

The decision by Netflix to drop its bid for Warner followed weeks of investor unease over the deal that shareholders viewed as strategically ambitious but financially risky.

When Netflix first revealed its acquisition plans, its share price fell sharply, reflecting concerns about dilution, integration complexity, and the assumption of Warner’s significant debt load. Analysts questioned whether absorbing a sprawling legacy media conglomerate would distract Netflix from its disciplined focus on profitability, advertising growth, and international expansion.

By stepping aside, Netflix halted further erosion of investor confidence. In fact, the Netflix share price rose after its announcement that it was dropping its bid for Warner.

Adding to the upside, Netflix is set to receive a $2.8 billion breakup fee because Warner chose to terminate its agreement in favor of Paramount’s higher bid. That windfall provides Netflix with substantial capital to reinvest in original programming, technology, and share repurchases—without the execution risk of a complicated merger.

Donald Trump: Winner

To some, President Donald Trump’s fingerprints were all over the chaotic endgame of Warner’s sale process, even though the winning bid ultimately came down to dollars and cents.

Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos traveled to Washington on Thursday for meetings at the White House with senior Trump administration officials, just hours before Netflix dropped out of bidding for Warner. The timing was hard to miss: less than two hours after Warner’s board formally deemed Paramount’s $31-per-share proposal “superior,” Netflix declined to counter—abruptly ending a months-long pursuit.

While Netflix framed its decision as discipline—a “nice to have” at the right price—Trump’s political pressure campaign had already raised the perceived regulatory and reputational costs of a deal. In the days leading up to Paramount’s revised offer, Trump publicly demanded Netflix remove board member Susan Rice, threatening unspecified consequences—an extraordinary intervention that signaled the merger would be judged through a partisan lens as much as an antitrust one.

Trump’s influence also flowed through relationships. The Ellison family, central backers of Paramount, have been described as close to the president—an alignment that critics argued gave Paramount an inside track as regulators weighed consolidation risks.

In the end, Trump didn’t have to block Netflix outright. By amplifying political headwinds and elevating Paramount as the more politically compatible bidder, he helped shape the lane Netflix ultimately chose to exit.

Linear Cable: Winner

The linear cable business, long written off as a casualty of the streaming revolution, may have found an unlikely lifeline in Paramount’s winning bid to acquire Warner.

Unlike a technology-driven buyer, Paramount maintains deep roots in traditional broadcast and cable operations. By combining Warner’s portfolio of cable networks—including major news, sports and entertainment channels—with Paramount’s own linear assets, the merged company would instantly command one of the largest bundles of must-have programming in the pay television ecosystem.

That scale strengthens negotiating leverage with cable and satellite distributors at a time when carriage disputes and cord-cutting have eroded subscriber counts. A unified Paramount-Warner lineup could make it harder for distributors to drop channels without risking customer backlash, potentially stabilizing affiliate fee revenue.

Advertising markets may also benefit. A larger linear footprint allows the combined company to offer bundled advertising packages across broadcast, cable and streaming platforms, giving marketers broader reach in a fragmented media environment.

Paramount’s victory suggests that linear cable remains an important pillar of the modern media business.

Movie Theatres: Winner

For movie theater owners battered by years of pandemic closures, shortened release windows, and streaming competition, Paramount’s winning bid to acquire Warner is being greeted as an encouraging sign.

Exhibitors see the potential merger as a reaffirmation of the theatrical model. Paramount has consistently backed exclusive cinema windows for major releases, while Warner’s film studio controls some of the industry’s most valuable franchises, from DC superhero films to big-budget fantasy and family fare. Together, the combined company would command one of Hollywood’s deepest theatrical slates.

Cinema chains argue that scale matters. A unified Paramount-Warner pipeline could deliver a steadier cadence of tentpole releases, reducing the feast-or-famine volatility that has plagued theaters in recent years.

The deal also signals that legacy studios still view theaters as a cornerstone of franchise-building. While streaming remains critical, theatrical runs generate cultural momentum, premium ticket pricing, and downstream value in pay television and digital sales.

Investors in exhibition companies responded cautiously but positively to news of the transaction, interpreting it as evidence that studios are recommitting to the big screen.

Challenges remain, including consumer price sensitivity and ongoing competition from streaming platforms. But for an industry fighting to prove its relevance, Paramount’s successful bid suggests that theatrical distribution remains central to Hollywood’s long-term strategy—and that movie theaters may once again play a starring role.

Larry Ellison’s Net Worth: Loser (Maybe?)

While Paramount’s pending acquisition of Warner has been framed as a transformative win, some industry observers caution that the long-term risks could weigh heavily on Larry Ellison and David Ellison.

Through their control of Skydance and its growing influence within Paramount’s corporate structure, the Ellisons have positioned themselves at the center of one of the largest consolidation plays in modern Hollywood history. But with scale comes exposure. Warner still carries significant debt from its prior merger, and integrating two sprawling legacy media companies presents operational and cultural challenges that have tripped up executives before.

Analysts point to the delicate balancing act ahead: preserving creative autonomy while extracting billions in promised cost synergies. Aggressive cost-cutting could alienate top talent and erode franchise value, while a lighter touch may disappoint investors expecting swift financial returns.

There is also market risk. Streaming growth has slowed industry-wide, advertising remains cyclical, and linear television continues to decline. If projected synergies fail to materialize or box-office performance falters, the enlarged company could face shareholder pressure and credit downgrades.

For Larry Ellison, whose fortune was built in technology, and David Ellison, who has championed blockbuster filmmaking, the bet represents a high-stakes expansion into the volatile economics of global media. In the short term, the deal elevates their influence. Over the long term, however, the financial and strategic burden of integrating Warner could test whether that influence translates into durable value.

Employees of Paramount and Warner Bros Discovery: Loser

As Paramount moves to complete its acquisition of Warner, anxiety is rising among employees on both sides of the deal who fear the transaction could bring significant disruption.

Large media mergers are typically justified by cost synergies, and executives have already signaled that billions in savings could be realized through consolidation. For employees, that language often translates into layoffs—particularly in overlapping corporate functions such as marketing, finance, legal, human resources, and technology. Redundant studio operations and back-office teams are especially vulnerable as the combined company looks to streamline decision-making.

Creative divisions may not be immune. When two major studios merge, film slates are often reevaluated, projects shelved and development pipelines narrowed. That can reduce opportunities for producers, writers, and mid-level executives whose roles depend on a steady flow of greenlights.

Cultural uncertainty also looms. Paramount and Warner have distinct corporate identities, leadership styles, and internal processes. Integrating those cultures can create friction, lower morale, and trigger voluntary departures among top talent wary of bureaucratic reshuffling.

Beyond job cuts, employees face longer-term concerns about strategic direction. With linear television revenues declining and streaming growth moderating, the merged entity will operate under intense investor pressure to deliver results quickly.

While executives argue the deal strengthens long-term competitiveness, many employees see a more immediate reality: consolidation often comes at the human cost of restructuring, uncertainty, and diminished job security.

What’s Next? Shareholder Meetings and a Lengthy Regulatory Review Process

First among the remaining steps is shareholder approval. Warner must hold a shareholders’ meeting to vote on whether to approve the sale to Paramount. The Warner board’s recent determination that Paramount’s $31-per-share proposal “could reasonably be expected to lead to a Company Superior Proposal” sets the stage for shareholder approval of the transaction.

Beyond corporate governance, regulatory approval remains a key barrier. Paramount has cleared the initial Hart-Scott-Rodino waiting period in the United States—a pre-merger antitrust check—and the company’s filings argue there is “no statutory impediment” to closing. Still, that is not the same as full regulatory clearance. Federal antitrust authorities, including the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, retain the authority to scrutinize the deal’s competitive impact on media markets. At the state level, California Attorney General Rob Bonta has opened an investigation into the merger’s potential effects on competition, employment and economic activity, signaling that state challenges could slow or complicate approval, or even lead to legal action.

International regulators will also weigh in. The European Union’s competition watchdog is expected to review the transaction, although it would appear that Paramount’s combined market share with Warner would remain below thresholds that typically trigger heavy EU regulatory scrutiny.

Only once shareholders assent and domestic and global regulators grant necessary clearances can the full merger transaction be cleared to close, potentially in late 2026—a result that will certainly reshape Hollywood and the overall media landscape.